Mohammed Ashraf v. Sri.M.P.Ajithkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt of Court case where the respondent submitted that the petitioner failed to appear before the authority as directed, and consequently, the contempt proceedings were closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court proceedings closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/19TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 246 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).4892/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4892/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19-02-2015
PETITIONER(S):
MOHAMMED ASHRAF, AGED 49 YEARS S/O. ABOOBACKER, SHEELATH HOUSE, NILAMBUR MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA
RESPONDENT(S):
SRI.M.P.AJITHKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. M.V.PUSHKARAN, SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676 505.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohammed Ashraf
- respondent
Sri. M.P. Ajithkumar
Coram
Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court