Jose V.S. v. Mini Manoj
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the High Court of Kerala dropped the proceedings after the respondent submitted that the earlier direction had been complied with. No substantive reasoning was recorded.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case dropped; no penalty imposed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/21ST PHALGUNA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 215 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).31309/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).31309/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-10-2013
PETITIONERS:
- JOSE V.S. VALLIKATTUKUZHIYIL HOUSE, MUTHOLY P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 597
- THOMAS MATHEW VADAKKEMURIYIL HOUSE, MUTHOLY P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 597
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
MINI MANOJ W/O.MANOJ, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS THE PRESIDENT, MUTHOLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUTHOLY P.O KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN 686 597
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jose V.S. and Thomas Matthew
- respondent
Mini Manoj
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court