Smt.Bindu John v. P.Sreejith
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam disposed of a contempt case arising from an interim order in a writ petition. The court held the respondent could not be proceeded against for closing the petitioner's canteen as he was interdicted from taking action, allowing him to apply to vary the order instead.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed; the respondent was granted liberty to apply to vary the interim order and is not proceeded against for non-compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/16TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1860 of 2016 (S)
-----------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C).NO. 6790/2016 DATED 09/3/2016)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SMT. BINDU JOHN, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.JOHN, AND RESIDING AT VAZHA PARAMBIL HOUSE, PULINKUNNU P.O, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT :
P. SREEJITH, AGED 50 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE TO THE PETITIONER), PRINCIPAL, COCHIN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PULINKUNNU P.O, ALAPPUZHA-688 504 (2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated an interim order of status quo by closing the petitioner's canteen.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Bindu John
- respondent
P. Sreejith
Coram
A. Muhamed Mustaque
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court