Jose P.V v. Maran Pandiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners in a contempt of court case appeared and submitted that a prior order dated 7.10.2016 had been complied with. The Court recorded this submission and closed the matter.
What did the court decide?
Closed as compliance of the pending order is weighed in evidence.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/5TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1856 of 2016 ()
ORDER DATED 7.10.2016 IN CRL.M.A.10594/2016 IN Crl.MC 6786/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN CRL. M.A /PETITIONERS IN CRL. MC.:
1. JOSE P.V AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. CHAKKU, PAYYAPPILY, VADATTUPARA P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM.
2. GEORGE MATHEW, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. MATHAI, PARAPPATTU HOUSE, VETTAMPARA P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOSE P.V
- petitioner
GEORGE MATHEW
- respondent
MARA PANDIYAN
- respondent
RISHIRAJ SINGH
- respondent
NARAYANANKUTTY
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court