Rajan.K v. Saju.M.S
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt of court case is closed after the court permitted petitioners to challenge the decision by appropriate means, noting their failure to consider the District Collector's report.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case closed; petitioners at liberty to challenge decision appropriately.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/18TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1722 of 2016 (S) -----------------------------WP(C) 33544/2015 DATED 09-03-2016 ---------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
1. RAJAN.K, AGED 57 YEAS, S/O. KRISHNAN, THEKKEPURATHU, THARAYIL KADAVU, VALIYAZHEEKAL P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
2. THANKAPPAN, S/O. MADHAVAN, THANKAVILASOM, THARAYIL KADAVU, VALIZYAZHEEKAL P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
3. PADMANJAN, S/O. PADMANABHAN, PADMAVILASOM, THARAYIL KADAVU, VALIYAZHEEKAL P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
4. ULLAS, S/O. AMBUJAKSHAN, KALAYKAL, THARAYIL KADAVU, VALIYAZHEEKAL P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
5. DHARMASUTHAN, S/O. SOOLAPANI, THANDASSERIL, THARAYIL KADAVU, VALIYZHEEKAL P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners are in contempt due to failing to advert to the District Collector's report when decision was taken.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJAN.K and others
- respondent
SAJU.M.S
- respondent
MAHESH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court