Leelakumari.M v. Nizamudhin
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt of court case was closed as the impugned order was superseded by writ appeals pending disposal. The petitioner is permitted to move for contempt afresh after those appeals are decided.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; petitioner allowed to approach for contempt afresh after disposal of writ appeals.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/7TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1673 of 2015 (S) IN W.P.(C). NO. 21096/2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P.(C). NO. 21096/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14-07-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C).:
LEELAKUMARI.M, AGED 67 YEARS D/O.MADHAVAPANICKER, 'DAYAMANDIR', T.C.1/1473 MEDICAL COLLEGE P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN 695011 NOW TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT 'ANANYATHEJAS' MEDICAL COLLEGE P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695011
BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.ELDHO SRI.JIJO THOMAS SRI.MALLENATHAN.M. SRI.ANEESH JAMES SRI.ANIL R.NATH
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC:
NIZAMUDHIN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LEELAKUMARI M
- respondent
NIZAMUDHIN
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court