Contempt petition closed because the alleged violation, a sale notice, was withdrawn by the respondent Corporation. The court did not dispose of the underlying writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/6TH ASWINA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 1658 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).3625/2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 3625/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 04-08-2016
PETITIONER(S):
1. ABDUL KARIM SAHIB NOUSHAD, S/O.ABDUL KARIM SAHIB, AGED 45 YEARS, NAUFAL MANZIL, KARAM VILA, MOONUKALLIMMODU, NAYYATTINKARA, TRIVANDRUM.
2. ABDUL KARIM SAHIB, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, NAUFUL MANZIL, KARAM VILA, MOONUKALLIMMODU, NATTINKARA, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI
RESPONDENT(S):
SURESH BABU T.R.,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AUTHORISED OFFICER, DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD., (DHEL) TRIVANDRUM BRANCH, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM-695 024.
BY SRI.K.THYAGARAJESWARAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
Cont.Case (C).No. 1658 of 2016
Dated this the 28th September, 2016
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the learned counsel for the respondent.
It is submitted that the sale notice complained of has since been withdrawn by the Corporation and further action will be taken in accordance with law. Hence, this contempt of case is closed.
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE
vgs28/9
Abdul Karim Sahib Noushad
Abdul Karim Sahib
Suresh Babu T.R.
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
