Dismissed
Arumughan v. Kuriakose
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1630/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/8TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1630 of 2008 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14795/2005 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 09-03-2007
PETITIONER(S):
1. ARUMUGHAN, S/O. APPASWAMY, SWAMI VILAS ROAD, THATHAMANGALAM.P.O, PALAKKAD. 2. SAHADEVAN, S/O. ARUMUGHAN, MOOTHACHETTIKULAMB, THATHAMANGALAM.P.O, PALAKKAD. 3. VASU, S/O. CHATHU, POONGODU (H), THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD. 4. VELAYUDHAN, ANDI, CHENTHAMARA NAGAR, THATHAMANGALAM PALAKKAD. 5. AROGYASWAMI, S/O. CHAMIKANNE, CHINGATTU KOLAMBU, CHENTHAMARA NAGAR THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD. 6. RADHARKSIHNAN, S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, VADAKKKETHARA, CHITTUR PALAKKAD. 7. NARAYANAN.R, S/O. APPUKUTTY, VADAKKETHARA, CHITTUR PALAKKAD. 8. NARAYANAN.A, S/O. APPUKUTTY, VADAKKANTHARA, CHITTUR PALAKKAD. 9. ARAVINDAKSHAN, S/O. PAZHANIMALA, VADAKKETHARA, CHITTUR PALAKKAD. 10. SUNDARAN, S/O. ARUMUGHAN, KAVILKALAM, THATHAMANGALAM.P.O PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 11. BABU, S/O. KUNJURAMAN, OLAKKAN VEEDU, NADUKKALAM, CHITTUR COLLEGE.P.O PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN
Con.Case(C).No. 1630 of 2008 (S)
RESPONDENT(S):
KURIAKOSE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER, SECRETARY, CHITTUR - THATTAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.SREERAMAKRISHNAN R22 BY ADV. SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR ADDL.R2 TO 21 BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN ADDL.R23 TO 27 BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1630 of 2008 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITONERS'EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE 1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (A) DEPARTMENT DATED 25.08.2001.
ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.14795/2005 DATED 9.3.2007.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P. A. TO JUDGE
Pn
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
----------------------------------
C.O.C. No.1630 of 2008
In
W.P.(C) No.14795 of 2005-J
---------------------------------Dated this the 28th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the directions in Annexure-II judgment of this Court dated 09.03.2007 have been complied with.
Hence, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is closed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge.
sp/28/01/16
Arumughan and others
Kuriosoce
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court