Everest P.A. v. v.R.Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner submitted that the corporation had already passed and served the relevant order, rendering the contempt proceedings unnecessary. The court accepted this submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt of Court case is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2016/28TH ASHADHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1491 of 2015 ()
JUDGMENT DATED 26.11.2014 IN WP(C) 31623/2014.
PETITIONER:
EVEREST P.A., AGED 67, S/O.P.P.ANTONY(LATE), PROPRIETOR, MEPCE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, 28/675-B, K.P. VALLON ROAD, ELAMKULAM, KADAVANTHARA PO, KOCHI-682 020.
BY ADV. SRI.H.RAMANAN
RESPONDENT:
V.R.RAJU, AGE & FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, KOCHI-682 011.
BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND, SC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Everest P.A.
- respondent
V.R. Raju
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court