Geetha v. M.C.John
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/15TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 130 of 2016 (S) IN MACA.811/2009
NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED IN THE JUDGMENT IN MACA 811/2009 DATED 22-05-2015
PETITIONER(S)/1ST APPELLANT IN MACA :-
GEETHA, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O.LATE SASIDHARAN PILLAI, SWAPNA NIVAS MANAKARA MURI, SASTHAMCOTTAH VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN
RESPONDENT(S):
M.C.JOHN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691 001.
BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.) SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW SMT.PREETHY R. NAIR SRI.M.A.GEORGE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
jvt
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
Cont. Case (C) No.130 of 2016
-------------------------------------------Dated this the 4th day of February 2016
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the direction, against which non compliance is complained of, has already been complied with and hence, this contempt case may be closed.
Recording the above submission, this contempt case is
closed.
Sd/ASHOK BHUSHAN
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
J UDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Jvt/4.2.2016.
Geetha
M.C. John
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court