This is a contempt case where the petitioner alleged non-compliance with a prior judgment. The petitioner filed the appeal claiming compliance has been achieved, leading to the closure of the contempt proceedings.
The contempt proceedings are closed, and the petition is disposed of without any further action being taken therein.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/14TH SRAVANA, 19382011
Con.Case(C).No. 1201 of 2016 (S)
------------------------------WP(C) 20477/2016 of THIS HON'BLE COURT ----------
PETITIONER(S):
1. GANGADHARAN S/O. SANKARAN, PALLALA VALAPPIL HOUSE, VATTAMKULAM, EDAPPA, MALAPPURAM.
2. E. SHIJU, S/O. SREEDHARAN, AGED 36 YEARS, ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, P.O., POLPAKKARA, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
1. K. RAMACHANDRAN
DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.
2. V. SURESHKUMAR,
DY. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678001.
3. H. MANJUNATH,
DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.
4. SRI. SARAVANAN, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD PIN-678 001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PAUL VARGHESE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
Con.Case(C).No. 1201 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1: JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 20477/2016 DT 22/6/2016.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE bp
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C)No.1201 of 2016
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the
judgment of this Court in W.P.(C)No.20477/2016 dated 22.6.2016 was not complied with as per the direction.
is complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason
to pursue the contempt proceedings any further.
Therefore, contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/5/8/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment in the underlying W.P.(C) was complied with leading to the closure of contempt proceedings.
Gangadharan S/o. Sankaran
E. Shiju
K. Ramachandran
V. Sureshkumar
H. Manjunath
Sri. Saravanan
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
