Azad.T v. P. Marykutty.I.a.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a Contempt of Court Case held not maintainable because the petitioner's annexed covering letter failed to answer the requirements for a Section 3A application under the Kerala Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, despite a prior direction to file such an application.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court Case closed as it is not maintainable.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/22ND ASWINA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1069 of 2016 (S) --------------------------WP(C) 24367/2015 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (C):
AZAD.T.,AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL REHIMAN, THAZHATHETHIL VEEDU, AKATHETHARA P.O., PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT(S)/ADDL.4TH RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
P. MARYKUTTY.I.A.S
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION,PALAKKAD-678 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable given that the annexed document does not comply with Section 3A of the Kerala Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008.
Whether to allow or close the Contempt of Court Case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Azad.T.
- respondent
P. Marykutty.I.A.S
- respondent
The District Collector, Civil Station, Palakkad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court