Mothilal v. Jacob
Case brief
What is this about?
The judge did not proceed with the contempt case due to the pendency of an appeal and closed it with liberty to move for contempt subject to the appeal result.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with liberty to move for contempt subject to the result in the appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/23RD JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1038 of 2015 (S)
JUDGMENT DATED 27.2.2015 IN WP(C) 30216/2011.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MOTTILAL, S/O.VASUDEVAN, AGED 56, CHONGAMATHARA, THIRUMALA BHAGOM P.O, CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
JACOB, WORIKING AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION KALOOR, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM P.O - 682 017.
R1 BY ADVS.SRI.BINU MATHEW SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOTTILAL
- respondent
JACOB
Coram
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court