N.P. Ramankutty v. v. Ratheesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court found that directions issued in a related contempt matter were complied with by the respondent. The Court accordingly closed the Contempt of Court case on the same day it was heard.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed as respondent complied with directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/29TH ASWINA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1032 of 2016 (s) IN WP(C).2300/2016
ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2300/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S):
1. N.P. RAMAN KUTTY SON OF LATE KESAVAN NAMBAIR NALISSERY PATTATH, VADAKKUM MURI.P.O., THRISSUR, PIN-680 570.
2. SUSHAMMA SUNDAR, WIFE OF LATE N.P.NARAYANANKUTTY, XXX/140/12, SREE MUKAMBIKA APARTMENTS, NEXT TO POST OFFICE, POONKUNNAM, TRISSUR-680 002.
BY ADVS.SRI.L.RAM MOHAN
SRI.M.AUBREY ABRAHAM ISAAC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.P. RAMAN KUTTY
- petitioner
SUSHAMMA SUNDAR
- respondent
V. RATHEESAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court