that the petitioner would marry her. Whether such a belief entertained by her is acceptable or not, will be examined during trial because the petitioner is a youngster aged 28 years and she is a divorce having a child. What is discernible from the complaint is that on many occasions the victim and the petitioner herein had sexual intercourse with full consent at different places on many occasions. Then it is not known how a clear case of rape can be made out. Let the prosecution try for it, and let the factual aspects be probed into during trial. The present concern of the court is whether investigation in the present circumstances would in any manner be affected if the petitioner is granted pre arrest bail. It appears that the victim thought of making a complaint against the petitioner when he thought of a marriage. She is aggrieved, that he is going to marry another lady. The important factual aspect to be probed into is whether the petitioner herein had made any promise to marry her, or whether the consent given by the lady on many occasions was in any manner vitiated by such a promise. If she simply believed that he would marry her, and thus submitted herself under such belief, it cannot be called a case of vitiated consent. I do not think that the investigation would be obstructed if the petitioner
