The High Court of Kerala heard a bail application filed by a third accused charged with offences under the IPC. The court considered the pendency of committal proceedings and the initiation of Section 107 Cr.P.C. proceedings before the Public Prosecutor.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2016/12TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 1528 of 2016 ()
CRIME NO. 1441/2015 OF KADAKKAVUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
VAISAKH, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT PARAKUDI HOUSE, PUTHEN NADA, VAKKOM VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKIL TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
SUNIL THOMAS, J.
=================
B.A.No.1528 of 2016
=================
Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2016
ORDER
Petitioner herein is the third accused in Crime No.1441 of 2015 of Kadakkavur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 506(i), 341, 324, 326, 307 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS Judge
Sbna/2/3/16
True Copy
P A to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the criminal case involving IPC offences.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
VAISAKH
STATE OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
