Y4KRISHNAN v. M.George
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for default as the appellant was absent when the case was taken up on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/20TH PHALGUNA, 1937
AS.No. 414 of 1997 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 56/1985 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA DATED 30-07-1996
APPELLANT(S)/1ST DEFENDANT:
R.KRISHNAN, PUTHEN MADATHIL, CHIRAKKADAVOM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.E.SUBRAMANI SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 2&4 TO 9:
- M.GEORGE AND BROTHERS BANKERS, KOZHENCHERRY.
- MATHAI MATHEW, MUTHOOT HOUSE, MALLAPUZHASSERI, KOZHENCHERRY.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.KRISHNAN
- respondent
M.GEORGE AND BROTHERS BANKERS
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court