Petitioner sought writ relief against university respondents. The court held the matter became infructuous and closed the petition without examining merits.
Petition closed as infructuous without examining merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 7608 of 2011 (A)
PETITIONER :
SEEMA PADMARAJAN, SECOND SEMESTER M.TECH STUDENT, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, MUTTAM, THODUPUZHA, PIN-685 587, (RESIDING AT VAZHEPARAMBIL, CHENGARA, PATTIMATTOM, P.O., PIN-683 562)
BY ADV. SRI.V.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM.
3. THE PRNCIPAL, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, MUTTAM, THODUPUZHA-PIN-685 587
BY ADV. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
W.P.(C) No. 7608 of 2011
-------------------------------------------------Dated this the 7th day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is closed as infructuous without examining the merits of the grounds raised.
Sd/-
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE
bka/-
//True copy//
PA to Judge
Seema Padmarajan
Mahatma Gandhi University
Controller of Examinations
Principal
A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
