Allowed

Sunil Kumar A.M v. Thrissur Corporation

Kerala HC17 Mar 2015WP(C)/7141/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court applied the ratio of a previous judgment to set aside the impugned order refusing building permission. It directed the respondent corporation to consider the fresh application after physical verification and pass orders within one month.

What did the court decide?

Ext.P2 set aside; Respondents directed to consider application afresh after verification and pass orders within one month.

Sunil Kumar A.M Vs Thrissur Corporation — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 7141 of 2015 (P)

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

SUNIL KUMAR A..M., S/O.MOHANAN, AGED 41 YEARS.

¶8

AKKARAKKARAN HOUSE

¶9

CHEROOR P.O., THRISSUR - 680 008.

¶10

SUDHEER KUMAR A.M., S/O.MOHANAN, AGED 39 YEARS. AKKARAKKARAN HOUSE

¶11

CHEROOR P.O., THRISSUR - 680 008.

¶12

BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON

¶13

SRI.A.R.NIMOD

¶14

RESPONDENTS:

¶15

THRISSUR CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR- 680 001.

¶16

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

¶17

THRISSUE CORPORATION, THRISSUR- 680 001.

¶18

R1,R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN R1,R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.N.HARIDAS R BY SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

WP(C).No. 7141 of 2015 (P)

¶21

APPENDIX

¶22

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

¶23

EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE, CHIYYARAM DATED 31/10/2014.

¶24

EXT P1(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P1.

¶25

EXT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONERS DATED 16/02/2015.

¶26

EXT P2(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P3.

¶27

EXT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.1939/2014 ON THE FILE THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 21/03/2014.

¶28

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL

/True Copy/

P.A to Judge.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

¶33

---------------------------------W.P. (C) No. 7141 of 2015 (P)

¶34

---------------------------------Dated this the 17^th day of March, 2015.

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

In the light of the ratio laid down in Ext.P3 judgment dated 21.03.2014, this Court disposes of the writ petition on the same lines applying the ratio laid down by this Court in the said decision, thereby setting aside Ext.P2.

¶37

Consequently, the 1^st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner, after subjecting the land in question to physical verification, and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶38

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

¶39

¶40

W.P.(C) No.19225/2014 -2-

Sunil Kumar A.M v. Thrissur Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar A.M v. Thrissur Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Layoni Vs Chalakudy Municipality

Thankamma M Vs Pallikkal Grama Panchayath

K.M.Anilkumar Vs the Thalassery Muncipality

Kanichai Hotels (P) Limited Vs the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram

Abdul Azeez Vs Secretary Municipal Coporation,Kollam

Dileep Subhakaran Vs Palakkad Municipality