Disposed

Prakash P.Thomas v. District Collector

Kerala HC6 Mar 2015WP(C)/6636/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Directed the 5th respondent to consider the petitioner's mutation applicationext.p8 within one month, after giving notice to the petitioner, and disposed of the writ petition. Petitioner submitted patta, tax receipt, and encumbrance certificate as evidence. No substantive legal principle was laid down.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 5th respondent to consider the mutation application (Ext. P8) with notice to the petitioner within one month.

Prakash P.Thomas Vs District Collector — Partition | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/15TH PHALGUNA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 6636 of 2015 (D)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

PRAKASH P.THOMAS, AGED 45 YEARS POTHENS HOUSE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM COCHIN 682036

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU CHERUKARA SMT.ROSAMMA MATHEW SRI.P.A.SALIM SRI.ANZAR BASHEER SRI.P.ANTO THOMAS SRI.PRATHEUSH.M.ANAND

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM AT COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, COCHIN-682 030.

¶11

2. SUPERINTENDENT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, ERNAKULAM AT CIVIL STATION KAKKANADU, COCHIN-682 030.

¶12

3. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A)

¶13

N.H.NO.3, KOCHI METRO RAIL PROJECT, S.O.B VYTTILA COCHIN-682 019.

¶14

4. COCHIN CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY CORPORATION OFFICE, KOCHI 682 011.

¶15

5. TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM, COCHN-682 011

¶16

6. VILLAGE OFFICER

¶17

ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, COCHIN-682 011.

¶18

R1, R2, R3, R5 & R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH R4 BY SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION SRI.P.K.SOYUZ, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

DCS

¶21

WP(C).No. 6636 of 2015 (D)

¶22

APPENDIX

¶23

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶24

EXT.P1 -	TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.1007/1990 OF ERNAKULAM SUB REGISTRY IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER DATED 17-3- 1990
EXT.P2 -	TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DATED 10-5-1977
EXT.P3 -	TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER DATED 19-1-2015
EXT.P4 -	TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER DATED 19-1-2015
EXT.P5 -	TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT BEARING NO.C-1144/09 DATED 13-12- 2012 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P6 -	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11-11-2013 BY THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER COCHIN CORPORATION & PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER TO THE PETITIONER
EXT.P7 -	TRUE COPY OF THE AREA REGISTER OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXT.P8 -	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR MUTATION DATED 2-2- 2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P9 -	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 25-2-2015

¶25

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

¶30

W.P.(C). NO. 6636 OF 2015

¶31

Dated this the 6^th day of March, 2015

¶32

JUDGMENT

¶33

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext. P8 application filed for mutation. The petitioner has sought mutation of the property on the basis of Ext. P1 document, Ext. P2 patta, Ext. P3 tax receipt and Ext. P4 encumbrance certificate.

¶34

I direct the fifth respondent to consider Ext. P8 application with notice to the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.

¶35

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶36

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

¶37

DCS

Prakash P.Thomas v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash P.Thomas v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Vs Sale Officer

O.J.Joseph Vs the Managing Director, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Sunil George Vs K.S.R.T.C.

Binu T.S. Vs the State Co-Operative Election Commission

Shihabudin Vs the Kerala State Electricity Board

Joy Joseph Vs Registrar of Co-Operative Societies