P.v.Abdulla Haji v. Nadapuram Grama Panchayat
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/20TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 5967 of 2015 (U)
PETITIONER :
-------------------
P.V.ABDULLA HAJI, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.ALI HAJI, PERUVAM HOUSE (HARIS MANZIL), PULIYAV P.O., PARAKADAV VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT PIN - 673 509.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AUGUSTINE(AREEKATTEL)
RESPONDENTS:-:
-----------------------
1. NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NADAPURAM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673 504.
2. ANTHRU,NALOMPUNATHIL HOUSE, KALLACHI P.O., PIN - 673 506.
3. AZEES,NALOMPUNATHIL HOUSE, KALLACHI P.O., PIN - 673 506.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.U.P.BALAKRISHNAN
R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.H.ABDUL RASAC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 5967 of 2015 (U)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ALONG WITH THE PRELIMINARY ORDER DATED 17.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P1(A). TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 15.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2(A). TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P2.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 14.01.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS.
EXHIBIT P3(A). TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P3.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
W.P.(C) No. 5967 of 2015
Dated this the 10th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Alleging inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in implementing Ext.P3 order, the petitioner has come up before this Court.
learned Standing Counsel for the respondent panchayath, on instructions, submitted that the panchayath is ready to
W.P.(C) No. 5967 of 2015
..2..
implement the directions in Ext.P3.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to implement Ext.P3 order within a period of one month from today.
To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent at the earliest.
Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE
bka/-
P.V.ABDULLA HAJI
NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT
ANTHRU
AZEES
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court