Petitioners claiming direct employment of loading workers filed a writ petition for declaration. The court noted a subsequent settlement between management and the union, rendered the issue no longer alive, and closed the petition as infructuous.
The writ petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/27TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 563 of 2009 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
RESPONDENT(S):
WP(C).No. 563 of 2009 (P)
-2-
BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
JUDGMENT
The petitioners were before this Court alleging that the workers for loading and unloading affiliated to the various Unions, whose cause the petitioners represent, were employed under a contractor. The petitioners claimed direct employment by the 5th respondent.
WP(C).563/09
2
In the above circumstances, the fact of
the settlement is recorded and the writ petition
is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Judge
Mrcs
//True Copy//
P.S. To Judge
V.A.SHAJU and others
STATE OF KERALA and others
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
