Sasidharan P.C v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition against recovery steps for defaulted educational loan disposed with undertaking by respondent Bank to consider One Time Settlement proposal.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition disposed on undertake that recovery steps would not be initiated until consideration is given to the One Time Settlement proposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 4553 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
1. SASIDHARAN P.C., CHITRITA HOUSE NO.PPIV/90 A KP. ROAD, PALLIKKUNNU, KANNUR - 670 004.
2. MISS MEGHA SASIDHARAN, D/O.P.C.SASIDHARAN, CHITRITA
HOUSE NO PPIV/90 A KP ROAD, PALLIKKUNNU, KANNUR - 670 004.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.) SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH SMT.DENNIS VARGHESE.
RESPONDENT(S):
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SASIDHARAN P.C. AND ANS.
- respondent
CANARA BANK AND ANS.
Coram
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court