B.Surendradas v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel submitted the writ petition has become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition on that ground.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937
WP(C).No. 4398 of 2012 (Y)
PETITIONER :
B.SURENDRA DAS, S/O BHANU PANICKER, SREE VISAKH, VANDITHADAM, VELLAYANI P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.B.PRADEEP SMT.N.G.SINDHU
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001
2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001
3. THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Surendra Das
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
The Commercial Tax Officer
- respondent
The Tahsildar
- respondent
The Vizhinjam International Sea Port Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court