Allowed

T.P.Anitha Kumari v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC23 Dec 2015WP(C)/39655/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition filed by a draftsman under the Kerala Water Authority regarding non-consideration of her representation dated 11.07.2015. The High Court of Kerala directed the Managing Director to consider the representation within three months without deciding on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2015 in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

T.P.Anitha Kumari Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 39655 of 2015 (F)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

T.P.ANITHA KUMARI AGED 54 YEARS W/O. RAGHAVAN K.V., DRAFTSMAN GRADE II, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. CIRCLE, KANNUR - 670 012.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.IVANS C. CHAMAKKAL

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES, (WSC) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

¶11

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WAGTER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 033

¶12

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. CIRCLE, KANNUR 670 012

¶13

4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WS.P. SUB DIVISION NO.1, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KANNUR 670 012.

¶14

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH R2 TO R4 BY SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

WP(C).No. 39655 of 2015 (F)

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶19

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E.4/80 DATED 17.8.1981 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT

¶20

P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/HO/E1/7068 (VOL.III)9C DATED 21.3.1991 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶21

P3: TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT ISSUED PROCEEDINGS VIDE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E1-22615/05 DATED 3.1.2007

¶22

P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 11.7.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶23

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶29

W.P.(C) No. 39655 of 2015 (F)

¶30

Dated this the 23^rd day of December, 2015

¶31

J U D G M E N T

¶32

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 representation dated 11.07.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2^nd respondent.

¶33

Considering the confined prayer made,

¶34

there shall be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

¶35

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2^nd respondent.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE

¶38

jjj 23/12/15

T.P.Anitha Kumari v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.P.Anitha Kumari v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Subramanian Vs Dr.T.a.Abdul Majeed

Prof.Jacob Thomas Vs the State of Kerala

Manager, Nadvathul Islam Up School Vs State of Kerala Represented by Secretary to Government

Dr.Janardhanan Vs State of Kerala

M/S.Krishna Hardwares Vs State of Kerala

P.v.Sindhu Vs the State of Kerala