Disposed

M.Thayyib v. the State of Kerala and Others

Kerala HC1 Apr 2015WP(C)/3687/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition against non-appointment under Rule 51B of KER. Upon learning the 5th respondent had already appointed the petitioner, the court directed the 4th respondent to approve the appointment without delay.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of with observation directing the 4th respondent to approve the petitioner's appointment without delay.

M.Thayyib Vs the State of Kerala and Others — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/11TH CHAITHRA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 3687 of 2010 (I)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

-----------------------

¶8

M.THAYYIB, S/O.MOHAMMED KUNJU, AGED 22 YEARS, MANNASSERIL HOUSE, S.V.MARKET POST, KARUNAGAPPALLY - 690 573.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶12

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14.

¶13

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶14

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶15

5. THE MANAGER, S.N.V.U.P.SCHOOL, MARUTHOORKULANGARA SOUTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶16

R1 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES R5 BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR

¶17

SMT.A.SALINI LAL

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

msv/

¶20

WP(C).No. 3687 of 2010 (I) -----------------------------------

¶21

APPENDIX

¶22

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

¶23

--------------------------------------

¶24

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE.

¶25

EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER (TTC). EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER.

¶26

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER OF SMT.NASEEMA. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE -DO- BY SMT.JASEELA.

¶27

EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER.

¶28

EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C/2595/09 OF THE ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER.

¶29

EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.B1/21618/2011 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR.

¶30

EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT DATED 20.8.2005.

¶31

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.S.TO JUDGE

Ms v/

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

¶37

W.P.(C)No.3687 of 2010

¶38

Dated this the 1^st day of April, 2015

¶39

JUDGMENT

¶40

This writ petition was filed voicing grievance against

¶41

non acceptance of the claim made by the petitioner for appointment under Rule 51B of Chapter XIV-A KER. It is conceded by counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as by the counsel appearing for the 5^th respondent that, during pendency of this writ petition the 5^th respondent had appointed the petitioner by accepting his claim under Rule 51B. Therefore the issue agitated no more survives for consideration.

¶42

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, what remains is only approval of the appointment by the Assistant Educational Officer, the 4^th respondent herein. It is for the 4^th respondent to consider approval of appointment of the petitioner without any further delay, if the 5^th respondent had duly submitted the order of

¶43

W.P.(C)No.3687 of 2010 2

¶44

appointment accompanied with all connected records.

¶45

The writ petition is hereby disposed of with the

¶46

above observation and direction.

¶47

Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE

¶48

MJL

M.Thayyib v. the State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Thayyib v. the State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.K.Kavitha Vs State of Kerala

B.Rajkumar Vs Kerala State Council for Science Techno

Sajan M. Vs Kannur University

Aneesh Rahim Vs Shri. Premachandran

Dr.K.Padmakumar Vs the Vice Chancellor and Others

K.Raghavan & Others Vs the State of Kerala & Others