Disposed
A.Naseeb v. Kerala State Electricity Board
Kerala HCWP(C)/36622/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936
WP(C).No. 36622 of 2010 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
A.NASEEB, S/O.K,ALIYARUKUNJU, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT MUKALUVILA VEEDU, MEKKON CHANDANATHOPE P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.LEO GEORGE SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR SRI.K.N.SASIDHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KILIKOLLOOR, KOLLAM-691 015.
3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KILIKOLOOR, KOLLAM-691 015.
4. VIJAYACHANDRAN, ASWATHY, CHANDANATHOPE P.O., KOTTAMKARA, KOLLAM-691 014.
5. SHAJAHAN, SHAJAHAN MANZIL, CHANDANATHOPE, KOLLAM-691 014.
6. SHANAVAS, SHAJAHAN MANZIL, CHANDANATHOPE, KOLLAM-691 014.
R,R1 TO 3 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B R,R5&6 BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL R,R5&6 BY ADV. SRI.SAIJU S. R,R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 36622 of 2010 (C)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
JV
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
W.P.(C). No.36622 of 2010
Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
This writ petition was filed seeking direction to restore electric supply to the premises of the petitioner. When the matter came up for consideration on 13.12.2010, this Court passed an interim order as follows:
“Admit. Issue notice to respondents.
The learned Standing Counsel on instruction, submitted that the petitioner could be given re-connection to the premises bearing door No.KP-1/120 F, provided the petitioner satisfies all the conditions contemplated under regulation 14(4)(b) of the KSEB Terms and Conditions of supply, 2005 (for short the 'Code'). Therefore, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to grant re-connection, in case, the petitioner complies with all the conditions and formalities under regulation 14(4)(b) of the Code. This shall be done within two days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order subject to the satisfaction of the conditions and formalities under 14(4)(b) of the Code.”
that consequent to the interim order the electric supply was restored, on the petitioner satisfying all the requisite conditions.
W.P.(C) No. 36622 /2010
2
Therefore the grievance no more survives for consideration at present.
Under the above-mentioned circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of making the interim order absolute.
JV
Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE
A.Naseeb
Kerala State Electricity Board
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Section
The Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section
Vijayachandran
Shajahan
C.K. AbduIm Rehim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court