Allowed

Joseph Salmon v. the Mahatma Gandhi University

Kerala HC24 Nov 2015WP(C)/34862/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A student sought writ relief to appear for his 5th semester exam after missing a portion of the course due to illness. The court allowed the direction but imposed conditions for application condonation of attendance deficiency.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to permit petitioner to write 5th semester examination subject to filing application for condonation of deficiency of attendance.

Joseph Salmon Vs the Mahatma Gandhi University — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 34862 of 2015 (G)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

JOSEPH SALMON, AGED 20 YEARS S/O.JOSHY, STUDING 5TH SEMESTER B.TECH (MECHANICAL ENGINEERING) AT MATHA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY MANAKKAPDI, KARUMALLOOR PO, N.PARAVUR ERNAKULAM KERALA 683511 RESIDING AT PUTHENPADATH HOUSE PALLIPORT PO, ERNAKULAM 683515

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.S.KUMAR

¶9

SRI.SIJO PATHAPARAMBIL JOSEPH

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY OFFICE PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686560

¶12

2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO KOTTAYAM 686560

¶13

3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY OFFICE PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686560

¶14

4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (EXAMS) MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY OFFICE PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO, KOTTAYAM 686560

¶15

5. THE PRINCIPAL

¶16

MATHA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAKKAPADI KARUMALLOOR PO, N.PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM KERALA 683511

¶17

BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

WP(C).No. 34862 of 2015 (G)

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶22

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT

¶23

P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT OF THE EXAMINATION FEES PAID BY THE PETITIONER DATED 31.10.2015

¶24

P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE DETAILS ISSUED BY THE 5H RESPONDENT

¶25

P4: TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE FURNISHED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 30.08.2015

¶26

P5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 09.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO REDO THE 4TH SEMESTER FOR THE LACK OF ATTENDANCE

¶27

P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR READMISSION IN TO THE 4TH SEMESTER BY THE PETITIONER TO THE MG UNIVERSITY DATED 08.12.2014

¶28

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

//True copy//

P.A. to Judge

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - W.P.(C) No. 34862 of 2015

¶35

- - - - Dated this the 24^th day of November, 2015

¶36

J U D G M E N T

¶37

Here is a case where a student of an Engineering College has approached this Court seeking a direction from this Court to permit him to appear for the 5^th semester examination. He says that he was ill from 03.08.2015 to 30.08.2015 and if that period is taken into consideration and also the fact that as per the University Calendar, the course started only on 24.07.2015, the petitioner will satisfy the required attendance conditions. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of this facility available to the student, he is not being allowed to be utilized it due to the adamant attitude of the Principal of the College.

¶38

Notice to the 5^th respondent was sent by special

¶39

messenger and it has been served. He has not entered appearance and answered Paragraph No. 6 of the writ petition.

¶40

W.P.(C) No. 34862 of 2015

¶41

-2-

¶42

Under these circumstances, it is only proper that the petitioner be allowed to appear for the 5^th semester examination subjected to conditions.

¶43

Hence, this petition is disposed of directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to write the 5^th semester examination subject to the conditions that he files proper application, if he has not already done so, for condonation of deficiency of attendance before the appropriate authorities and the result of the examination will be published only after the decision is taken on such an application.

¶44

Sd/-

¶45

P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE

¶46

¶47

//True copy//

¶48

P.A. to Judge

Joseph Salmon v. the Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joseph Salmon v. the Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muneer K.M. Vs State of Kerala

T.O.Thomas Vs P.K.Sasidharan

Alexander @ Shaji Vs State of Kerala

Biju Vs the State of Kerala

M.Balan Vs C.K.Radha

Lalitha Vs the State of Kerala