Allowed

Deepa Surendran v. Thrissur Corporation

Kerala HC16 Feb 2015WP(C)/3233/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, applied the ratio from Shahanaz Shukkoor v. Chelannur Grama Panchayath, quashed an order rejecting a building permit application and directed the respondent corporation to consider the application afresh with physical verification within one month.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order quashed; direction to respondent to consider building permission application afresh within one month.

Deepa Surendran Vs Thrissur Corporation — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU

¶4

MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/27TH MAGHA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 3233 of 2015 (D)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

DEEPA SURENDRAN, KALAPPURAKKAL HOUSE, VENKIDANGU, THRISSUR.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA SRI.K.D.SREEVISAKH

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

THRISSUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR - 680 001.

¶11

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR - 680 001.

¶12

R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN, SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.V.N.HARIDAS

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

WP(C).No. 3233 of 2015 (D)

¶15

: 2 :

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶18

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT DATED 15.12.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶19

EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.01.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶20

EXT.P2(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2.

¶21

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

¶26

---------------------------------W.P. (C) No. 3233 of 2015 (D)

¶27

¶28

Dated this the 16^th day of February, 2015.

¶29

JUDGMENT

¶30

In the light of the ratio laid down in Shahanaz Shukkoor v. Chelannur Grama Panchayath (2009 KHC 4499), this Court disposes of the writ petition on the same lines applying the ratio laid down by this Court in the said decision, thereby setting aside Ext.P2.

¶31

Consequently, the 1^st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner, after subjecting the land in question to physical verification, and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶32

Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

¶33

¶34

W.P.(C) No.19225/2014 -2-

Deepa Surendran v. Thrissur Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepa Surendran v. Thrissur Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Martin Vs Cheranallur Grama Panchayath

M.I.Shajahan Vs Alice George

U.P.Thyagu Vs Welfare Fund Inspector, Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Board

Dr.K.P. Manoj Vs University of Calicut

M.S.Binu Vs State of Kerala

Pradeep M.P Vs the Regional Joint Director