Disposed

M.v.Thomas v. the Regional Transport Officer

Kerala HC10 Feb 2015WP(C)/30582/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala upheld an interim order, making it absolute. The direction requires the Regional Transport Officer to accept motor vehicle tax without insisting on clearance from the Kerala Motor Transport Workers' Welfare Fund Board.

What did the court decide?

The interim order dated 13.12.2013 directing acceptance of tax without insistence on fund clearance is made absolute.

M.v.Thomas Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/21ST MAGHA, 1936

¶5

WP(C).No. 30582 of 2013 (W)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

M.V.THOMAS, MEENKOLIL HOUSE, THAMARACHAL, KIZHAKKAMBALAM.P.O.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN.H.

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER (TAXATION OFFICER), OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-31.

¶11

2. THE DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS' WELFARE FUND BOARD, SRM ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 018.

¶12

3. M/S.PPK SONS,

¶13

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, GEORGE.P.K, AGED 61 YEARS, PEECHAKARA HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 691.

¶14

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUNITHA VINOD R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN, SC,KMTWF BOARD

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

mbr/

¶17

WP(C).No. 30582 of 2013 (W)

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

¶20

P1COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 3.9.2013.

¶21

P2COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 10.08.2012 IN W.P[C]NO.18980/2012 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶22

P3COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 17.08.2012 IN W.P[C] NO.18980/2012 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶23

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: - NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.S. TO JUDGE

mbr/

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

¶28

W.P.(C) No. 30582 of 2013

¶29

-------------------------------------------------Dated this the 10^th day of February, 2015

¶30

J U D G M E N T

¶31

In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the 1^st respondent to accept motor vehicle tax for his vehicle without insisting for clearance from the Motor Transport Workers' Welfare Fund.

¶32

The petitioner purchased a Stage Carriage bearing Reg.No.KL 44-8889 on 02.09.2013 from a motor transport establishment covered under the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. The petitioner's grievance is that the 2^nd respondent is not accepting welfare fund contribution from the petitioner for the period he has become the registered owner. The petitioner points out that the previous owner was exempted from making payment under the Motor Transport Workers' Welfare Fund Act as evidenced by Exts.P2 and P3. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

¶33

This Court, by interim order dated 13.12.2013,

¶34

..2..

¶35

W.P.(C) No. 30582 of 2013

¶36

directed the 1^st respondent to accept motor vehicle tax for the petitioner's vehicle without insisting on a clearance from the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board. It was further directed that the tax should be accepted for the current quarter. It was made clear that the petitioner should pay the dues to the 2^nd respondent from the date of transfer of the vehicle.

¶37

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the basis of the interim order, tax has been remitted.

¶38

As there is convincing evidence that the petitioner's establishment is covered under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, this Court is of the view that the interim order already passed has to be made absolute.

¶39

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of making the interim order dated 13.12.2013 absolute.

¶40

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE

¶41

bka/-

M.v.Thomas v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.v.Thomas v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amina Aliyar Vs Union of India etc.

A.v.Sajeev Vs the Food Corporation of India

Sarojini Vs State of Kerala

Sabin Mathew Vs the Principal

G.Baby Vs the District Telecom General Manager

Sajikumar T.G Vs the Kerala State Electricity Board