Dismissed
K.Vincent v. Tahsildar
Kerala HCWP(C)/2721/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937
WP(C).No. 2721 of 2012 (M)
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
K.VINCENT, PARAYANVILA VEEDU, PONVILA, AYIRA P.O., PARASALA.
BY ADVS.SRI.L.MOHANAN
SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATINKARA-695 121.
2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, CHENKAL-695 132.
3. SYLUS RAJEEVAN, KAMALAVILASOM BUNGLOW, MEENOTTUKAVU, ARAYOOR DESOM, CHENKAL VILLAGE, AYIRA P.O., PIN-695 502.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.J. MICHAEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HARILAL, J.
W.P. (C) No.2721 of 2012-M
Dated this the 12h day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter in issue involved in this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
(K. HARILAL, JUDGE)
Nan/
//true copy//
P.S. to Judge
K.VINCENT
SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATINKARA
VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, CHENKAL
SYLUS RAJEEVAN
K. Harilal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court