This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/29TH KARTHIKA, 1937
WP(C).No. 26885 of 2012 (I)
PETITIONER(S):
1. K.THANKAPPAN UNNITHAN, AGED 76 YEARS, PRESIDENT, EAST KALLADA (SOUTH) SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. Q 187, KIZHAKKE KALLADA P.O ., KOLLAM (NOW RESIDING AT KAROTTUPILLA VEEDU, KOLLAM DISTRICT) .
2. SELESTINE P.,
3. LALITHABAI T.,
MEMBER, EAST KALLADA (SOUTH) SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. Q 187, KIZHAKKE KALLADA P.O., KOLLAM (PULIKKAMUKKIL KIZHAKKATHIL, THAZHAM WARD, KIZHAKKE KALLADA P.O, KOLLAM).
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001..
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOLLAM-691001..
3. THE EAST KALLADA (SOUTH) SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. Q 187, KIZHAKKE KALLADA P.O, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-691502..
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.J.MICHAEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-112015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OKB
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
.................................................. WP(C)No.26885 of 2012
.................................................. Dated 21st November, 2012
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the writ petition is not pressed. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE
lgk
East Kallada (South) Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
State of Kerala
Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies
East Kallada (South) Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
K. Hari, L. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
