C.Ashokmkumar v. Rubber Board
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as there was no representation from the petitioner on the day of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
WP(C).No. 21263 of 2006 (F)
PETITIONER(S):
C. ASHOK KUMAR, THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RUBBER BOARD REGIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR SRI.T.V.AJAYAKUMAR SRI.K.SANDESH RAJA SMT.M.SONA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. RUBBER BOARD, KOTTAYAM-686 002, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
2. CHAIRMAN, RUBBER BOARD, KOTTAYM-686 002.
3. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES, NEW DELHI REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. ASHOK KUMAR
- respondent
RUBBER BOARD
- respondent
CHAIRMAN, RUBBER BOARD
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court