Disposed

Muhammed Anas v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 Jul 2015WP(C)/21026/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court closed a writ petition challenging the refusal to register a car due to lost documents. The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to submit a proper application with required affidavits. The matter is disposed of without striking down the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed based on the petitioner's undertaking to submit the requisite application with affidavit.

Muhammed Anas Vs State of Kerala — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015/19TH ASHADHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 21026 of 2013 (C)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

MUHAMMED ANAS

¶8

D-1/536, MELEPUTHEN VEEDU, KOVALAM VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM`

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.A.ABDUL HAKKIM SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU

¶10

RESPONDENT(S):

¶11

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KRALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARAIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶12

2. THE SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, NEYYATTINKARA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695121

¶13

3. THE MANAGER,

¶14

KULATHINKAL MOTORS, TOLL JUNCTION, CHACKAI KAZHAKKUTTAM BYPASS ROAD, ANAYARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695029

¶15

R3 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SIVAJI

¶16

R1-R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.K. REFEEK

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No. 21026 of 2013 (C)

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶21

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE TAX INVOICE EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICAGTE OF INSURANCE DATED 01-01-2013 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE CUSTOMER PROPOSAL FORM EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE EMI DETAILS

¶22

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKADA POLICE STATION

¶23

EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS

¶24

EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶25

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL

¶26

--------------------------------------

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE

SKV

P.V.ASHA, J.

===================

W.P.(C). No.21026 OF 2013

¶33

=======================

¶34

Dated this the 10^th day of July, 2015

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

Petitioner is aggrieved by the refusal to register his car.

¶37

The non-registration is on account of non-production of the relevant documents.

¶38

In para 4 of the statement filed by the 2^nd respondent it

¶39

is stated as follows:-

¶40

“In this circumstances that the petitioner submits that original of sale certificate and the temporary permit have been irrecoverably lost, he may have to apply for registration with duplicate obtained from the concerned authorities accompanied by an affidavit sworn before a notary to the effect that the above documents have been irrecoverably lost. If the petitioner submits an application in the above manner accompanied by other requisite documents, his application for registration can be considered.”

¶41

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

¶42

will furnish the application accordingly.

¶43

On the basis of the above submission this writ petition is

closed.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA, JUDGE

SKV

Muhammed Anas v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muhammed Anas v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Benno Pereira.F.G. Vs Mahatma Gandhi University

Susamma Luke Vs Corporation of Kollam

Alice George Vs the Pala Municipality

Dr.K.Prathapan Vs Kerala Agricultural University

V.K.Soman Vs Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

Babu Vs the Nannamukku Grama Panchayath