T.V. Harikumar v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner approached High Court apprehending sale of pledged gold ornaments. Court noted no sale steps taken and petitioner given liberty to approach again.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to approach the Court again if a sale notice is published.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2015/17TH ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 19420 of 2015 (B)
PETITIONER(S) :
T.V.HARIKUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.VISWAMBHARAN, PADATHARA HOUSE, P.S. ROAD, OFF AZAD ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI- 17.
BY ADV. SMT.C.G.AJITHA
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. SYNDICATE BANK, REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER, BANERJEE ROAD BRANCH, ERNAKULAM- 682 018.
2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR, MUMBAI- 400 001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.V.HARIKUMAR
- respondent
SYNDICATE BANK
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court