The writ petition was closed as the petitioner's grievance regarding property tax arrears no longer subsisted due to an earlier interim order directing the respondent municipality to decide on the petitioner's representations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937
WP(C).No. 16865 of 2006 (G) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
DR.O.RAGHUTHAMAN, “PRASHANTHI”, KARANGALPADY, KODAIBAIL P.O. MANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE. BY ADVS.SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR SMT.P.K.PRIYA
RESPONDENT(S):
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P(c) No.16865 of 2006-G
Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
At the time when the Writ Petition came up for admission, this Court had passed an interim order directing the respondent-Municipality to take a decision on the representations referred to in this Writ Petition. This interim order was passed as early as on 29.06.2006. The grievance of the petitioner was as against the demand notice issued towards the arrears of property tax.
In the light of the interim order passed, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner does not subsist and accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed.
Sd/-
(P.V.ASHA, JUDGE)
rtr/
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
Dr. O. Raghuthaman
Commissioner of Municipalities, Thiruvananthapuram
Kanhangad Municipality
P.V.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
