the petitioner's name did not figure in the provisional list published as per Exhibit P3. The grievance put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that teachers would have considerable difficulty in getting school admissions to children and it is to avoid that, the University itself has, by its norms, provided for a proposal to be published by way of a list, before 15th of March. Only in that context, the transfer now made of the petitioner at Exhibit P1 shall be kept in abeyance till 31.03.2016; since the 3rd respondent does not press his request for transfer and also considering the fact that now considerable time has elapsed from the commencement of the academic year. The petitioner, however, would be liable to be transferred as indicated in the impugned order, in the next academic year, unless the University takes a decision to the contrary.