Tamilvanan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged matters via WP(C). No. 1500 of 2013. Court declared petition infructuous and closed it without examining merits.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed without examining the merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/13TH MAGHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 1500 of 2013 (J)
PETITIONER:
TAMILVANAN, AGED 33 YEARS S/O.MUNIAN, REHABILITATION PLANTATIONS LIMITED UNIT 1 BLOCK III, AYIRANALLOOR, MANIYAR P.O. PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 325.
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR)
RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LABOUR AND REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE REHABILITATION PLANTATIONS LIMITED PUNALUR - 691 305, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tamilvanan
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Managing Director, Rehabilitation Plantations Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court