The High Court of Kerala held that a writ petition challenging school fee enhancement became infructuous by the lapse of time following advancements made in the matter before the lower court.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937
WP(C).NO. 14582 OF 2012 (W) ----------------------------
PETITIONER:
-----------
NEENA JOSE, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.REMMY JOSE, 8E, CAMPAIGN APARTMENTS EDAPPALLY-24.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERALEDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. COUNCIL FOR INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS (CISCE), REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND SECRETARY, PRAGATI HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, 47-48 NEHRU PALACE, NEW DELHI-110019.
3. THE INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL(TIPS), COCHIN CAMPUS, EDACHIRA, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
4. THE INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL(TIPS), REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, TIPS COIMBATORE MAIN, 193 SATHY ROAD, SS KULAM.P.O, COIMBATORE-641107.
5. KALABHAVAN EDUCATION TRUST,
R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA R3-R5 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR R3-R5 BY ADV. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ R3-R5 BY ADV. SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. V.K. RAFEEK
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
K. HARILAL, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P. (C) No.14582 of 2012
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Writ Petition challenging the enhancement of school fees during the period from 2012 to 2013 and the matter has become infructuous.
also, it is seen that this Writ Petition is filed challenging enhancement of school fees under Exts.P2 and P4 for the period 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Having regard to the grievance projected in this Writ Petition, as rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent, I find that the matter in issue has become infructuous, by
W.P.(C) No. 14582 of 2012
-: 2 :-
the lapse of time.
In the above view, this Writ Petition will stand as
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
JUDGE
DST
//True copy//
P.A. To Judge
Neena Jose
State of Kerala
Council for Indian School Certificate Examinations
The Indian Public School (TIPS), Cochin Campus
The Indian Public School (TIPS)
Kalabhavan Education Trust
K. Harilal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
