Disposed

Meenakshi.S v. the Vice Chancellor, University of Calicut

Kerala HC16 Jul 2015WP(C)/13977/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court issued a direction to the University of Calicut to consider the petitioner's claim regarding condensed attendance, right to appear for the fourth-semester examination, and release of results within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's claim and pass appropriate orders within three weeks.

Meenakshi.S Vs the Vice Chancellor, University of… — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 13977 of 2015 (V)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

MEENAKSHI.S., AGED 21 YEARS B.TECH (CIVIL), IVTH SEMESTER STUDENT GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CALICUT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.M.M.SHERIFF

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PO CALICUT UNIVERSITY-673 635.

¶11

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PO CALICUT UNIVERSITY-673 635.

¶12

3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CALICUT.673635

¶13

R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERS

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

RKC

¶16

WP(C).No. 13977 of 2015 (V)

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶19

EXT P1 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO R3 DATED 7-4-2015.

¶20

EXT P2 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO R1 DATED 9-4-2015.

¶21

EXT P3 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO R3 DATED 2-5-2015.

¶22

EXT P4 : TRUE COPY OF PROFORMA SHOWING WORK HOURS.

¶23

EXT P5 : TRUE COPY OF MC DATED 25-11-2014.

¶24

EXT P6 : TRUE COPY OF MC DATED 27-3-2015.

¶25

EXT P7 : TRUE COPY OF ART FEST WINNER CERTIFICATE

¶26

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL

RKC

TRUE COPY

PA TO JUDGE

P.V.ASHA, J.

W.P.(C) No.13977 of 2015

¶32

Dated this the 16^th day of July, 2015

¶33

JUDGMENT

¶34

The petitioner had appeared for the IV^th Semester

¶35

examination of B.Tech Degree course on the basis of the interim order passed by this Court on 5.6.2015. On account of shortage of attendance, she was not permitted to appear for the examination, initially.

¶36

The learned standing counsel appearing for the University submitted on instructions that the shortage of attendance is beyond its control. A statement has also filed on the behalf of respondents 1 and 2.

¶37

The grievance of the petitioner is that the result of the examination is not published and she is not permitted to appear for the V^th semester examination.

¶38

In the above circumstances, there will be a direction to the

¶39

first respondent to consider the case of the petitioner (ie. in respect of her claim for condoning shortage of attendance, right to appear in the examination as well as to get her results of IV^th

¶40

W.P.(C) No.13977 of 2015

¶41

:2:

¶42

semester examination released), in accordance with law and to

¶43

pass appropriate orders, within a period of three weeks.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA,

JUDGE.

rkc

Meenakshi.S v. the Vice Chancellor, University of Calicut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meenakshi.S v. the Vice Chancellor, University of Calicut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shifa Sadiq Vs Government of Kerala

Babu Vs the Nannamukku Grama Panchayath

Allokandy Kunjiraman Vs the State of Kerala

Vazhathope Service Co-Operative Bank Vs Agri Bio Care

The Managing Director Vs Kerala State Transport Employees Co-Op.Society

Pallickal Naseer Vs the State Election Commission