Dismissed

C.v.Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC9 Jun 2015WA/1110/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ appeal filed against the Single Judge's judgment which rejected the petitioner's challenge to revenue recovery and auction of his land. The court observed no strong ground for interference with the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed without precluding the appellant from applying for the Government Order Amnesty Scheme benefits.

C.v.Vinesh Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

WA.No. 1110 of 2015 () IN WP(C).6476/2013

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6476/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23-06-2014

¶7

APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER:

¶8

C.V.VINESH, AGED 31 YEARS S/O.VIJAYAN RESIDING AT CHERULLIL CHAURIYEDATH HOUSE PULLOOT.P.O, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6:

¶11

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695001.

¶12

2. THE BOARD OF REVENUE(EXCISE), TRIVANDRUM

¶13

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003.

¶14

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR-680003.

¶15

5. THE TAHSILDAR, KODUNGALLUR. THRISSUR PIN-680582.

¶16

6. TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, WELFARE FUND OFFICE, THRISSUR-680003.

¶17

BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.I.DAVIS BY SRI.RENIL ANTO,SC,KTWWF BOARD

¶18

THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ &

¶20

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================

W.A No. 1110 of 2015

================

Dated this, the 9^th day of June, 2015

¶25

J U D G M E N T

¶26

Ashok Bhushan, CJ

¶27

This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 23^rd of June, 2014 in W.P (C) No. 6476/13. The writ petition was filed by the appellant challenging the revenue recovery proceedings culminating in Ext.P6, where 80 cents of land belonging to the petitioner comprised in Sy.No.372/2 of Pulloot Village was auctioned in favour of the Government for an amount of `1/.

¶28

Learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment dismissed the writ petition. Learned Single Judge noticed that petitioner had filed the writ petition in 2013 challenging the proceedings which was concluded in the year 2000. We do not find any good ground in this appeal to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge.

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted

¶30

WA No.1110/15

¶31

-:2:-

¶32

that Government has already issued GO(MS) No.64/2015/T.D. dated 21^st of April, 2015 by which an Amnesty Scheme has been introduced for defaulters. He submits that petitioner is entitled to make an application for availing the said benefit. We observe that the dismissal of the writ petition and this appeal shall not preclude the appellant from submitting an application in accordance with the Government Order dated 21^st of April, 2015 as stated above.

¶33

Subject to the above observation, the appeal is dismissed.

¶34

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶35

Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE

¶36

¶37

//True Copy//

¶38

PS to Judge

C.v.Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.v.Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aysha R.S. Vs P.C.Binoy

Rajagopal Pai Vs K.G. Babukumar

Sajani @ Ahina Vs Sainudeen

Jayalal D. Vs the Chief Manager/Authorissed Officer

M.M. Abdul Kareem Vs Government of Kerala

Chandramathi Vs State of Kerala