Aliumma v. Pararatt Ayssa
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937
RSA.No.584 of 2007 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 66/2002 of SUB COURT, VADAKARA DATED 13-10-2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 57/1999 of MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM DATED 05-082002
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 IN AS:
BY ADVS.SRI.N.L.KRISHNAMOORTHY SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN SMT.SATHYA SHREEPRIYA SMT.S.SUJA
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS IN AS/DEFENDANTS IN OS:
BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN BY ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-122015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
R.S.A.No.584 Of 2007
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2015.
Sri.N.L.Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, submits that despite consistent and diligent efforts, he could not secure any instruction from the appellants and therefore, the appeal may be closed for non-prosecution.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, this Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
ALEXANDER THOMAS,
Judge.
bkn/-
Aliumma
Pararatt Ayssa
AlexANDER Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court