Sobhana v. Kunjupillai
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal dismissed for default as the appellant and her counsel failed to appear on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/22ND JYAISHTA, 1937
RSA.No. 1052 of 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 8/1997 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURTI, MAVELIKKARA. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 333/1994 of MUNSIFF COURT,KAYAMKULAM.
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ADDL.4TH DEFENDANT:
SOBHANA, KUNNEL VEEDU, MALAMEL BHAGOM, KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., KAYAMKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.SASITH.M.R
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3, 5 TO 8:
- KUNJUPILLAI, ANANTHASSERIL HOUSE, (DIED) KANDALLOOR VADAKKUM MURI, VADAKKUM MURI VILLAGE.
- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sobhana
- respondent
Kunjupillai
- respondent
The State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court