P.J.Sebastian v. Thilakaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
In this review petition, the High Court of Kerala, upon objection by counsel, ordered the expungement of the opening sentence of paragraph 25 in the challenged judgment, finding the prayer limited to said objection.
What did the court decide?
The review petition is allowed and the first sentence in paragraph 25 of the judgment under review is expunged.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937
RP.No. 899 of 2015 () IN RSA.538/2007
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 538/2007 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:
P.J.SEBASTIAN, S/O.LATE OUSEPH PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOY THATTIL ITTOOP SRI.A.G.ADITYA SHENOY
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS:
1. THILAKARAJ @ THILAKAN, S/O.BHASKARAN PANIKKAPARAMBU VEEDU, VARANAM MURI THANNEERMUKKAM VADAKKU VILLAGE, CHERTHALA - 688001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first sentence in paragraph 25 of the impugned judgment should be expunged at the instance of the review petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.J. Sebastian
- respondent
Thilakaraj @ Thilakan
- respondent
Pushpakumar @ Pushkaran
- respondent
Santhoshkumar @ Santhosh
- respondent
Bindhumol
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court