Dismissed

Sudhakrishna T.K. v. Director General of Health Services

Kerala HC7 Oct 2015RP/880/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this review petition, the petitioner claimed there was an error on the face of the record for not considering a prayer from the writ petition. The bench held that since the main judgment reserved the right to decide those issues in appropriate proceedings, no such error existed. The review petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The review petition was dismissed as there was no error apparent on the face of the record.

Sudhakrishna T.K. Vs Director General of Health… — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 RP.No. 880 of 2015 () IN WA.2133/2015 --------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2133/2015 DATED 29.9.2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28706/2015 DATED 23.9.2014

¶5

REVIEW PETITIONER(S):

¶6

SUDHA KRISHNA.T.K (MINOR) AGED 17 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND GUARDIAN T.K.SUDHAKARAN S/O. RAMAKRISHNAN T.K., THANNIKUNNATH HOUSE POST NHANGATTIRI, VIA PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

¶7

BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶8

RESPONDENT(S):

¶9

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 108.

¶10

THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION KERALA STATE, DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶11

CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ALL INDIA PRE-MEDICAL TEST UNIT, SHIKSHA KENDRA, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110 092 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶12

THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, 5TH FLOOR, KSHB BUILDINGS SHANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶13

THE PRINCIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

¶14

R1 BY SRI.T.V.VINU, CGC R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.I. DAVIS R BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC, CBSE

¶15

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

sou.

¶17

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J -------------------------------------------------------------R.P. No.880 of 2015 in W.A. No. 2133 of 2015

¶18

--------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 7^th day of October, 2015

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Shaffique, J

¶21

Review petition has been filed to review judgment dated 29.9.2015. In the review petition, it is submitted that there is error apparent on the face of record in so far as the first prayer in the writ petition, clause 3 in Exhibit.P5 has not been considered.

¶22

In fact, while disposing of the appeal we have clearly indicated that the issues raised in the writ petition is left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings. In fact learned Single Judge has also reserved the said right. In such circumstances we do not think that there is any error apparent on the face of the record to review the judgment. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed.

¶23

Sd/ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE

¶24

// True copy //

¶25

sou.8/10/15

Sudhakrishna T.K. v. Director General of Health Services

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhakrishna T.K. v. Director General of Health Services

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Surendran Nair Vs Smt.Nalini Netto

K.Gopinathanan Vs Kerala Gramin Bank

Joseph Vs State of Kerala

M.K.Chellappan Nair Vs Sunny.J.and Others

Geetha Ramanujan Vs Estate Manager

N.a.Sheriefa Vs Sabna K.