V.B. Sheeba v. Appu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a review petition in a civil suit, finding no apparent error on the face of the record. The judgment clarified that the Advocate Commissioner's report remains admissible in the pending suit subject to objections filed.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed; it is clarified that the Advocate Commissioner's report can be used in the pending suits subject to objections.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/18TH PHALGUNA, 1936
RP.No. 719 of 2014 (O) IN OP(C).1881/2014 ------------------------------------------IN OP(C) 1881/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18.08.2014
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
V.B. SHEEBA, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.BABURAJ A.K., RESIDING AT ALIL, PUTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.JAGADEESH LAKSHMAN SRI.P.C.CHACKO(PARATHANAM) SRI.N.S.DAYA SINDHU SHREE HARI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN OP:
- APPU, ALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 004.
- SARASWATHY, W/O. APPU, ALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOTHOLE DESAM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK - 680 004.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review petition can be entertained to explore the possibility of settlement when parties are at warring ends.
Whether an order dismissing a review petition warrants observation on the admissibility of an Advocate Commissioner's report.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.B. Sheeba
- respondent
Appu
- respondent
Saraswathy
- respondent
Ramachandran
- respondent
Supraba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court