On the day of admission (11-06-2015), the Single Judge allowed the review petition filed by the deceased's daughter. The petition was due to a mistake in producing an annexure already considered. The judgment was recalled, and the original writ petition was closed with liberty to the parties.
Review Petition allowed. Judgment recalled. Original petition closed with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/21ST JYAISHTA, 1937
RP.No. 480 of 2015 (O)
---------------------------------OP (MAC) 23/2015 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
RAJI K.R., D/O. LATE RAJAN.K.K., KATTIPOYIL, CHITTARIKAL AMSOM, KAMBALLOOR DESOM, KAMBALLOOR P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMNATH (E)
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :
1. ANEESH M.A., S/O. SISILY AUGUSTINE, MATTATHIL HOUSE, KAPIKKARA, EDAVARAMBA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT - 670511.
2. SEBASTIAN, S/O.JOY SEBASTIAN, KAROTTAYIL HOUSE, P.O. JOSGIRI, CHERUPUZHA, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670141.
3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PAYYANNUR P.O.
BY SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
RP.No. 480 of 2015 (O)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE I: AFFIDAVIT OF THE REVIEW PETITIONER DT 31/5/2015.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
R.P No. 480 of 2015
in
O.P(MAC) No. 23 of 2015
Dated this the 11th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
The review is filed, since the petitioner who had
appeared by herself before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, committed a mistake insofar as producing Ext.P2 herein which I.A as per the number disclosed therein had already been considered by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, the review petitioner seeks
that the judgment may be recalled and the writ petition closed with liberty.
Review Petition allowed. Judgment recalled. Original
petition closed with liberty.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)
jma //true copy//
P.A to Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the review petition filed due to a mistake in producing a document already considered by the Tribunal.
Whether to recall the judgment and close the original writ petition with liberty.
Raji K.R.
Aneesh M.A.
Sebastian
The New India Assurance Company Limited
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
