Single judge order dismissing the review petition held to have no error apparent on the face of the record in the earlier order from the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/20TH JYAISHTA, 1937
RP.No. 472 of 2015 () IN CRP.259/2009
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP 259/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 01-10-2014
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
K.KRISHNANKUTTY, AGED 72 S/O.LATE PANGI, PALAKKODE HOUSE MATTUR P.O., ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON
SMT.V.BHARGAVI (PANANGAD)
RESPONDENT(S):
R BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN. R2 AND R3 BY SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
R.P.No.472 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.259 of 2009 --------------------Dated this the 10th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
There is no error apparent on the face of the record. The Review Petition is hence dismissed.
Sd/V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
K. KRISHNANKUTTY
SMT. V. BHARGAVI
TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD
K.S. BALASUBRAMANIAN
R. MURALIDHARAN
STATE OF KERALA
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
