Allowed

Shri.M.K.Ranjith v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Kerala HC3 Jun 2015RP/414/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition filed challenging a High Court judgment for not considering an additional prayer for stay directions. The court recalled the earlier judgment and disposed of the writ petition by allowing the review, granting the additional direction sought.

What did the court decide?

Review petition allowed; writ petition recalled and determined to dispose of the additional prayer.

Shri.M.K.Ranjith Vs the Commercial Tax… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/13TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

RP.No. 414 of 2015

¶6

JUDGMENT DATED 07-04-2015 IN WP(C) 11297/2015.

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶8

SHRI.M.K.RANJITH, PROPRIETOR, BROWNNIES BAKERY, TALAP, KANNUR-670002.

¶9

BYSRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN

¶10

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, IIIRD CIRCLE, KANNUR - 670 001.

¶12

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, NIRMAL ARCADE, ERNAHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-670 006.

¶13

3. THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, GOPALAPURAM - 678 024.

¶14

4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, KANNUR - 670 001.

¶15

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMBIL

¶16

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

mbr/

¶18

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

¶19

R.P. No. 414 of 2015

¶20

¶21

W.P.(C). No. 11297 of 2015

¶22

===================================================== Dated this the 3^rd day of June, 2015

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The review petition is filed seeking a review of the judgment dated 07.4.2015 in W.P.(C) No.11297 of 2015 on the ground that while disposing the writ petition, this Court did not consider the additional prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition, for a direction to the appellate authority to consider and pass orders in the stay petition and to keep the coercive steps initiated against the petitioner, till such time as orders are passed in the stay petition.

¶25

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶26

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that in the judgment dated 07.04.2015, the further prayer of the petitioner for a direction to dispose the stay petition was not considered by this Court. Under the circumstances, I recall the judgment dated 07.04.2015 and take up the writ petition for disposal by allowing the review petition.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE

¶29

das

Shri.M.K.Ranjith v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri.M.K.Ranjith v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saji Abraham Vs R.Rajasekharan Nair

Rajasekhar.G.K Vs M/S.Heera College of Engineering

K Sasidharan Vs the Director General (Crpf)

Hamza K. Vs Sri.Ajith Patil

Sabeesh Kumar Vs the Regional Transport Authority

V.Gopalan Vs Chengannur Municipality