The single-judge division allowed the review petition on the condition that the petitioner argue the matter without further adjournments to pronounce a final decision on merits. The case was posted on 16.02.2015.
Review petition allowed conditioned on petitioner arguing the matter without further adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/22ND MAGHA, 1936
RP.No. 120 of 2015 () IN WP(C).4159/2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4159/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18.12.2014
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
ANILKUMAR K, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.V.KARUNAKARAN, PILLAI, THUNDATHIL HOUSE, THRUTHIKKARA P.O., KUNNATHUR, KOLLAM - 690 540.
BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER R BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. ---------------------------------R.P. No. 120 of 2015 in W.P. (C) No. 4159 of 2014
---------------------------------Dated this the 11th day of February, 2015.
ORDER
The review petition is allowed on the condition of the petitioner arguing the matter without further adjournments, so that quietus may be put on the litigation by pronouncing on merits. Accordingly, post W.P.(C) No. 4159 of 2014 on 16.02.2015 in the admission list.
sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge.
rv
W.P.(C). No. -2-
Anilkumar K
The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Kerala
The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
The Secretary, Kerala State Public Service Commission
Dama Seshadri Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
